Re: [PATCH hurd 4/6] x86_64: do not define mach_cpu_subtypes since we don't use it

[Samuel Thibault]

Applied, thanks!

Flavio Cruz, le dim. 21 janv. 2024 16:07:55 -0500, a ecrit:
> ---
>  proc/cpu-types.c | 2 ++
>  proc/host.c      | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/proc/cpu-types.c b/proc/cpu-types.c
> index 3d89d5a..7a814f6 100644
> --- a/proc/cpu-types.c
> +++ b/proc/cpu-types.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ const char *const mach_cpu_types[] =
>  #endif
>    };
>  
> +#ifndef __x86_64__
>  const char *const mach_cpu_subtypes[][32] =
>    {
>      [CPU_TYPE_VAX] =
> @@ -167,3 +168,4 @@ const char *const mach_cpu_subtypes[][32] =
>       [CPU_SUBTYPE_ALPHA_21064] = "ALPHA_21064",
>        },
>    };
> +#endif  /* !__x86_64__ */
> diff --git a/proc/host.c b/proc/host.c
> index 823bda5..c2b53c3 100644
> --- a/proc/host.c
> +++ b/proc/host.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,9 @@ void
>  initialize_version_info (void)
>  {
>    extern const char *const mach_cpu_types[];
> +#ifndef __x86_64__
>    extern const char *const mach_cpu_subtypes[][32];
> +#endif
>    kernel_version_t kv;
>    char *p;
>    struct host_basic_info info;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

-- 
Samuel
<i> ben oui ce serait idiot, mais osb
  -+- m'en fous de faire un truc débile ! -+-