[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-indent] Patch vs indent-2.2.8
From: |
david ingamells |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-indent] Patch vs indent-2.2.8 |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:51:21 +0200 |
Cristalle,
Thank you for the updates. I have not yet examined the code changes or looked
at the fit between your new arguments and the existing/desired arguments, but
I see no immediate problems. I shall be merging this and some other submitted
patches over the coming couple of weeks, with the aim being to make the next
release in August.
I cannot guarantee that I'll take your updates as-is but I'll contact you if
I discover problems.
Regards,
David.
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 2:42 pm, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added support for the indentation-style we use in our
> group. This adds the following:
>
> --preprocessor-indentation (pwi) if set, will indent nested
> preprocessor-statements with
> n spaces per level. overrides
> -lps.
>
> --dont-pad-operators (npop) no spaces to either side of + == etc.
> --pad-operators (pop) the default.
>
> --no-space-after-commas (nsac) foo(a,b,c) rather than foo(a, b, c)
> --space-after-commas (sac) the default.
>
> --no-space-in-for (nsif) for(a;b;c) rather than for(a; b; c)
> --space-in-for (sif) the default.
>
> --cuddle-right-braces (crb) you'll hate this unless you like lisp.
> --dont-cuddle-right-braces (ncrb) the default.
>
>
>
> I feel that these add even more flexibility and consistency to
> indent (if you have control over spaces *after* "for", you should
> have control over spaces *in* for etc. : ).
>
> Please let me know if there are more elegant ways of implementing
> some of the stuff, you're more familiar with the code.
> Also feel free to yell at me if I broke anything. : )
>
> Azundris, hackerette-in-training
--
David Ingamells
address@hidden
+31 (013) 5093388 (home)
+31 615010947 (mobile)