[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] regarding route
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] regarding route |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:23:50 +0200 |
Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> So I'm reworking route (for the third time since I've always manage to
> misplace it). Question is, should we support the old syntax for
> route?
What is "old syntax"? Do you mean "route add|del ... netmask ...", etc?
If so, then definitely - yes, we should.
> Currently, I'm ignoring that, but before I go about adding it
> to inetutils, the easy (and right since it will keep the real version
> clean) solution is to have a shell script wrapper that would work like
> `the old' route, what do people think?
Let's split the task. Do it your way and I'll add the "old syntax"
later, as I did for ifconfig.
Regards,
Sergey