[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: [SCM] GNU Inetutils branch, master, updated. ine
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: [SCM] GNU Inetutils branch, master, updated. inetutils-1_7-34-ge6013a6 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:57:15 -0500 |
> Wouldn't it be better if this was displayed with --help instead?
That's what I wanted to do initially, but then I thought that this
would make help output too copious. Perhaps the best way would be
to output a short list of available formats (without docstrings)
with --help, and let the user obtain more verbose help on each
format with --format=help. What do you think?
A short list without the docstrings is I think the way to go,
something like:
# ld --help
Usage: ld [options] file...
...
ld: supported targets: elf32-i386 a.out-i386-linux pei-i386 elf32-little
elf32-big srec symbolsrec verilog tekhex binary ihex trad-core
...
#
Keeping --format=help is a good idea.
> And the --verbose stuff, I think that should be in the manual.
Yes, sure. But I planned to do that after I'm finished with the
modifications (I've got some unfinished improvements of format
engine in my local tree).
Super, keep the onslaught coming! :-)