[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc
|
From: |
David Lutterkort |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2008 16:38:35 +0000 |
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:17 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Only after writing the above did I go look at the unmodified
> code in gnulib's argz.c, and there, I saw all of the similar,
> existing uses of assert. Now I see why you've done this.
Hi Jim,
Yes, that's the only reason I added the asserts. I'd be more than happy
to rip the mout. Do you want me to send a revised patch with that ?
David
- [PATCH 0/2] Add missing functions to argz, David Lutterkort, 2008/05/28
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add missing functions to argz, Eric Blake, 2008/05/28
- [PATCH 2/2] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc, David Lutterkort, 2008/05/28
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/05/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc, David Lutterkort, 2008/05/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2, updated] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc, David Lutterkort, 2008/05/29
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/05/29
[PATCH 1/2] Make stpcpy LGPLv2+, David Lutterkort, 2008/05/28