[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin]
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin] |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:37:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
On 6/17/2010 9:14 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 6/12/2010 4:58 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:28:41PM CEST:
>>> In 69, the library fails to open:
>>
>> No idea. Maybe having the error reporting from libltdl fixed may help
>> get a better clue here?
>
> What do you mean by this? Are you referring to the problem Peter
> O'Gorman's patch addresses?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-06/msg00080.html
I guess not. With Peter's patch, I get the same error output as before:
--- expout 2010-06-17 21:33:17.864000000 -0400
+++
/usr/src/packages/libtool/git/build/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/71/stdout2010-06-17
21:33:34.183000000 -0400
@@ -9,11 +9,7 @@
first_open denies a request
result: module_symbol
first_open denies a request
-last_open ("last"): last_ctx
-last_sym (last): last_ctx
-result: last_symbol
-first_open denies a request
last_open denies a request
+lt_dlopen failed: file not found
first_exit: first_ctx
-last_close (last): last_ctx
last_exit: last_ctx
../../libtool/tests/dlloader-api.at:422: exit code was 1, expected 0
Oh well.
--
Chuck
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], (continued)
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/15
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/16
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/16
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/16
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/17
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Peter Rosin, 2010/06/12