[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#73620: libtool-2.5.3 broken on CentOS and Alma Linux
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
bug#73620: libtool-2.5.3 broken on CentOS and Alma Linux |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Oct 2024 23:04:05 +0200 |
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Ileana is absolutely right: the reason for this behavior is that some
> paths are excluded from compile_rpath in func_mode_link. The original
> idea was to prevent paths from outside of the source tree from appearing
> before ones lying beneath it. However, simply omitting such paths was
> not right, they should be reordered instead. The attached patch fixes
> this. With it, both bug_71489.at in libtool, and all tests in gettext
> pass.
Thanks. I confirm that with this patch, all gettext tests pass. The xgettext
wrapper script (attached) now has the complete relink command:
with libtool-2.5.3:
relink_command="(... -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/bruno/inst-x86_64-64/lib)"
with your new patch added:
relink_command="(... -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/home/bruno/gettext-2024-10-02/build-64/libtextstyle/lib/.libs -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/home/bruno/inst-x86_64-64/lib)"
Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> The relink command seems to be set by fast_install=yes:
Indeed, there is a difference here.
On Ubuntu 22.04:
$ grep fast_install ./gettext-runtime/libasprintf/config.status
./gettext-runtime/intl/config.status ./gettext-runtime/config.status
./libtextstyle/config.status ./gettext-tools/config.status
./gettext-runtime/libasprintf/config.status:enable_fast_install='needless'
./gettext-runtime/libasprintf/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./gettext-runtime/intl/config.status:enable_fast_install='needless'
./gettext-runtime/intl/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./gettext-runtime/config.status:enable_fast_install='needless'
./gettext-runtime/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./libtextstyle/config.status:enable_fast_install='needless'
./libtextstyle/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./gettext-tools/config.status:enable_fast_install='needless'
./gettext-tools/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
On Alma Linux 9:
$ grep fast_install ./gettext-runtime/libasprintf/config.status
./gettext-runtime/intl/config.status ./gettext-runtime/config.status
./libtextstyle/config.status ./gettext-tools/config.status
./gettext-runtime/libasprintf/config.status:enable_fast_install='yes'
./gettext-runtime/libasprintf/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./gettext-runtime/intl/config.status:enable_fast_install='yes'
./gettext-runtime/intl/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./gettext-runtime/config.status:enable_fast_install='yes'
./gettext-runtime/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./libtextstyle/config.status:enable_fast_install='yes'
./libtextstyle/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
./gettext-tools/config.status:enable_fast_install='yes'
./gettext-tools/config.status:fast_install=$enable_fast_install
Where does this difference come from?
hardcode_action is 'immediate' in both cases.
inherit_rpath is 'no' in both cases.
shlibpath_overrides_runpath is 'yes' on Ubuntu, 'no' on Alma Linux.
Apparently the difference comes from the configure test marked with a comment
"Some binutils ld are patched to set DT_RUNPATH"
Bruno
alma9-new-xgettext-wrapper
Description: application/shellscript