[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Barcheck warnings
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Barcheck warnings |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:47:21 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> But this is getting complicated. IMHO the only important difference is
> between
> O(1) and O(# of bars), the rest is just cosmetics.
>
> (and I hope the barCheckSynchronize can be defaulted to #t sometime in the
> future if it works fine, barcheck failures is not exactly something you plan
> to do :) )
With the new check, I suppose barCheckSynchronize is no longer
necessary, we can do away with it entirely.
This will be a slight problem for people that relied on its behavior
for faking partial measures.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen