bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: /etc/profile.d/lilypond.sh is a bad idea


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: /etc/profile.d/lilypond.sh is a bad idea
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:08:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Just a warning:
Note that this solutions requires more active support of the
packaging rules. This has been a problem with the Debian package,
where the package maintainer has not had the time to follow the
quick development of LilyPond so the installation has not always
been complete.

  /Mats


Reuben Thomas wrote:
I would advise mimicking the debian approach, installing under TEXMF
using symlinks, see debian/rules.  Even better yet, have make install
do this if it finds tetex, and move it out of specific distribution
scripts.


That sounds good.


--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]