Re: The definition of \finger markup is bad

bug-lilypond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The definition of \finger markup is bad

From:	Erik Sandberg
Subject:	Re: The definition of \finger markup is bad
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:43:31 +0200
User-agent:	KMail/1.6.2

On Friday 20 August 2004 11.36, Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> The definition of \finger markup is bad. The numbers are too small and
> I'm not sure if they are typeset with the number family.

The bug is fixed in 2.3.12.

Erik

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

The definition of \finger markup is bad, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/08/20
- Re: markup-fingering, Erik Sandberg, 2004/08/20
  - Re: markup-fingering, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/08/20
  - Re: markup-fingering, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: markup-fingering, Erik Sandberg, 2004/08/22
- Re: The definition of \finger markup is bad, Erik Sandberg <=

Prev by Date: Re: [bug] CVS version of lilypond-book.itely has a wrong command
Next by Date: slur-bow resurrected in 2.3.12!
Previous by thread: Re: markup-fingering
Next by thread: segfault in 2.3.11
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread