[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible bug

From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Possible bug
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:06:15 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913

See Werner's answers! He knows these things much better than I do.


Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Mats Bengtsson writes:

That is, as long as you don't want to use your teTeX installation
to typeset anything else, I presume. In other words, the cygwin
installation script could do such an ugly fix if tetex-tiny is
installed but not tetex-base.

You lost me here.  I thought you found that ecrm1000 should not be
looked for at all?

I tried Bertalan's example file here and the dvips command with
$KPATHSEA_DEBUG set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000,

I'd gladly fix the Cygwin tetex installation, but I want to be sure to
make the right fix and not add another bug.

Bertalan, what does Mats's command give you?  Can you send a
(comressed) log file to the list?


        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]