Re: slurs clashing with portato marks (which are inverted!)

[Mats Bengtsson]

I checked two references in my book shelf, and both say that the dot 
should be
closest to the note head, so the current implementation seems to be wrong.

  /Mats

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
>  
>
> > > Isn't the idea that you can use c^.^- to get the dot below the
> > > line and c^_ to get the dot above the line?
> > >
> > >   /Mats
> > >
> > >      
> > Yes, that works (it also solves the slur clash problem).  But it's unclear 
> > then what the "portato" mark is for.  I've never seen it used the way 
> > lilypond draws it.
> >    
>
> It's entirely possible that I've reversed the sign.  I'd be grateful
> for someone to check in a good reference work, and apply the relevant
> change in the MF sources (probably swapping a "u" and "d" for the
> portato sign.)
>
>
>  
>
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > SEEK: Now with over 60,000 dream jobs! Click here:   
> > http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
> >    
>
>