[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater
From: |
Trevor Bača |
Subject: |
Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:46:01 -0600 |
On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> > On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >>Trevor Bača wrote:
> >>
> >>>This is a weird one. If you have the following three conditions ...
> >>>
> >>
> >>yes, it's a build issue. Only MacOS has this problem.
> >
> >
> > Ah, yes. Sorry I didn't mention: I am, in fact, on OS X.
>
> can you see if you can further reduce it? ie. less notes, less
> measures, etc.
Only shows up if the combination of the number of notes together with
the make-moment value to proportionalNotationDuration causes the
beamed part of the expression to break across lines. So I'm having a
hard time stretching the example out with ever smaller values to
proportionalNotationDuration (meaning that I'm having a hard time
reducing the overall number of notes in the example).
I'll try more during lunch here next hour.
--
Trevor Bača
address@hidden
- 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Trevor Bača, 2006/03/13
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/15
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Trevor Bača, 2006/03/15
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/15
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater,
Trevor Bača <=
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Trevor Bača, 2006/03/15
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/16
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Trevor Bača, 2006/03/16
- Re: 2.7.38 bug: proportional duration beaming of 32nds and greater, Trevor Bača, 2006/03/19