[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8)
From: |
Arvid Grøtting |
Subject: |
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8) |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:26:28 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Marcus Macauley <mmacauley <at> riseup.net> writes:
> So, Joe, whatever it is that you fixed, there still seems to be a problem
> in 2.9.22.
I think this was fixed *after* 2.9.22, so that makes sense. ;-)
--
Arvid,
waiting for 2.9.23 (and 2.10)
- Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Arvid Grøtting, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Arvid Grøtting, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Graham Percival, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Trent Johnston, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/08
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/12
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/17
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/10
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/14
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/14
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/17
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/22
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/22