Re: Proposal for tracker: spanner misalignment via context "interference"

[Trevor Bača]

2008/2/14 Valentin Villenave <address@hidden>:

> 2008/2/13, Trevor Bača <address@hidden>:
>
> > Could you please consider this one for the tracker?
>
> Thanks Trevor (actually your mail came through).
>
> Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=580
>
> You're right, it's a very annoying bug; however, I won't mark it as
> High-priority, as it does not prevent the program from running (Graham
> taught me that High-priority ranking is only for segfaults etc.)
>
> I can only mark it as Medium-priority (and considering our lack of
> developers, almost everything I add these days is Low-priority, so
> after all it does provide a higher rank than average bugs).
>
> I'm really looking forward to seeing LilyPond's situation evolve in a
> better way; I'm already learning C++ to get more involved and
> hopefully, able to fix some bugs in a distant future... but it's a
> long shot :)


Very good. The prioritization makes sense. And it would be incredible if you
could get into the internals ... I think we'd all get tremendous benefit
from it!





-- 
Trevor Bača
address@hidden