Re: Phrasing slur collisions

[Neil Puttock]

Hi Marco,

2008/9/1 Marco Caliari <address@hidden>:
>> I'm not top posting.
> Hi,
> In the following snippet I collected three phrasing slur collisions
>
> \version "2.11.56"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> \relative c'' {
> \key f \major
> \time 6/8
> r4 d8\( g4 aes8
> a!4
> % first collision with the flat symbol
> bes8 g4 d'8\)
> r8 g,,,16\( c d e f g b d
> % second collision with the natural symbol
> b' a
> g4 ~ g16 f16
> e4.\)
> \stemUp
> \times 2/3
> % thirs collision with the "3" of the tuplet
> {d16[^\( cis d]} bes4^\)
> }
> In particular, the third can be eliminated using ( ) instead of \( \).

Phrasing slurs should avoid tuplet numbers. I've pushed a fix for this
which will appear in the next release.

> Is there a way to workaround without using the (tedious)
> #'control-points property?

You could try inserting hidden notes where the collision takes place,
which would move the slur a bit further away.

Regards,
Neil