[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wide-char is wide

From: Francisco Vila
Subject: Re: wide-char is wide
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:30:01 +0100

>From your kind explanation would be right to say that the argument to
the LilyPond \char command is a simple natural number and not a
multibyte utf-8 sequence? This is what --I think-- still has to be
made clear.

2009/3/25 Hans Aberg <address@hidden>:
> You might search this page for "code point":
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode
> It just a natural number assign to each abstract character it defines. The
> section
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode#Architecture_and_terminology
> describes the convention of writing these numbers with the prefix "U+":
> numbers below 2^16 are written with four hex digit, and other with five or
> six as is needed.


Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)

The incredible carnival of Badajoz

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]