[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wide-char is wide

From: Robin Bannister
Subject: Re: wide-char is wide
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:31:07 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I prefer to use "Unicode hexadecimal value".

There are too many sorts of Unicode hexadecimal values 
for this to be reliably unambiguous. 

I think the "hexadecimal" bit is a red herring 
and only needs mentioning once, as in: 
> where hhhh is the hexadecimal code for the character required 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]