Re: Issue 602 in lilypond: Feature request: better support for Sacred Harp notation

[lilypond]

Updates:
        Labels: -Type-Documentation Type-Enhancement

Comment #34 on issue 602 by percival.music.ca: Feature request: better  
support for Sacred Harp notation
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=602

Vaelentin, please don't change the Type of an issue once it's been fixed.

After comment 29, you have four options:
1)  say "sorry, it doens't look fixed to me", change the Status, and remove  
the
fixed_2_13_20 label.
2)  say "great, looks fine" and mark it verified.
3)  say "looks ok, but I don't see a regtests", mark it verified, and open  
a new
issue for the missing regtest.
4)  say "the output looks good, but I'm going to open a new issue for some  
doc item",
verify the item, and open a new item.

I think you want #3 for this one, or maybe #4.