The regtest or the behaviour?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
"Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message
news:address@hidden
Thanks, changed in git. It should look different in 2.13.27.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
Carrying on looking at documenting undocumented regtests and came across
chord-scripts.ly. It looks from this as if the regtest is trying to
demonstrate placement of scripts above and below the chord.
Unfortunately,
this doesn't seem to work. There's also what seems to be a bug in the
regtest itself, with the line < c_^ e^^ > 4 being repeated, instead of
one
occurrence being < c_^ e_^ > 4 which I guess is what's needed. If someone
can confirm these are bugs, I'll raise reports.
\relative c''{
<c^^>4
<c_^>4
c^^
c_^
}
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond