Re: Strange behaviour with transposing clefs

[Patrick McCarty]

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Patrick McCarty <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I've been experimenting with transposing clefs to write a snippet, and found
>> that if you try to transpose a clef with a zero transposition, you actually
>> get 2.  Trying 2 gives no clef at all.  Trying 1 (for what it's worth) gives
>> a clef but no transposition.
>>
>> I think the behaviour with 1 is correct, since a transposition of 8 actually
>> moves 7 notes, but I think the 2 and 0 are the result of just adding a
>> fiddle factor without checking the result.  Not convinced anyone will use
>> these odd numbers, but still think it's a bug?
>>
>> \relative c' {
>>  \clef treble
>>  c c c c
>>  \clef "treble^0"
>>  c c c c
>>  \clef "treble_2"
>>  c c c c
>>  \clef "treble_0"
>>  c c c c
>>  \clef "treble^2"
>>  c c c c
>> }
>
> This appears to be a bug.  I'll look into it shortly, though I can't
> file a proper report at the moment.

Reported here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1177

I'll push a fix shortly.

Thanks,
Patrick