bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue 1329 in lilypond: \afterGrace placement/behaviour to be discussed


From: lilypond
Subject: Issue 1329 in lilypond: \afterGrace placement/behaviour to be discussed
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:01:01 +0000

Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low

New issue 1329 by address@hidden: \afterGrace placement/behaviour to be discussed
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1329

Original report by Dmytro O. Redchuk:
-------------------------------------

Hi.

Playing with \afterGrace (rather simply "typing" it) i've found this somewhat strange. Documentation says that \afterGrace should last 3/4 of of the length of the main note by default and this fraction may be changed. But looking at the picture i would rather say that it lasts for "some small value" and "wastes" 3/4 (1/2 in the last staff) of the length of the main note (makes it "void"). Listening to midi -- it sounds in the middle of the note (for the last staff), really (as a separate track?).

%
% a bit modified version of
% http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/28/lily-25f937e5.ly,
% see example in
% http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes
%
\relative c'' {
  <<
    \new Staff {
      c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
    }
    \new Staff {
      c1
      c8 c c c c c c c
      c1
    }
    \new Staff {
      #(define afterGraceFraction (cons 1 2))
      c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
    }
  >>
}


Attachments:
        aftergrace.png  2.5 KB




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]