[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 1329 in lilypond: \afterGrace placement/behaviour to be discussed
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Issue 1329 in lilypond: \afterGrace placement/behaviour to be discussed |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:01:01 +0000 |
Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
New issue 1329 by address@hidden: \afterGrace placement/behaviour
to be discussed
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1329
Original report by Dmytro O. Redchuk:
-------------------------------------
Hi.
Playing with \afterGrace (rather simply "typing" it) i've found this
somewhat strange. Documentation says that \afterGrace should last 3/4 of of
the length of the main note by default and this fraction may be changed.
But looking at the picture i would rather say that it lasts for "some small
value" and "wastes" 3/4 (1/2 in the last staff) of the length of the main
note (makes it "void"). Listening to midi -- it sounds in the middle of the
note (for the last staff), really (as a separate track?).
%
% a bit modified version of
% http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/28/lily-25f937e5.ly,
% see example in
%
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes
%
\relative c'' {
<<
\new Staff {
c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
}
\new Staff {
c1
c8 c c c c c c c
c1
}
\new Staff {
#(define afterGraceFraction (cons 1 2))
c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
}
>>
}
Attachments:
aftergrace.png 2.5 KB
- Issue 1329 in lilypond: \afterGrace placement/behaviour to be discussed,
lilypond <=