Re: Please rewrite << { ... } \\ { ... } >> construct

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:26:41PM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 8 November 2010 13:05, Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Please repost your mail as a comment there, I think it will be more
> > appropriate, useful and (possibly) efficient :-)
> 
> Actually I'm sad when I see this issue is tagged "Type-Enhancement"
> and "Priority-Postponed".
> From a user point of view it is really a "HIGH annoyance" issue, since

Then offer a bounty, or start investigating how to fix it
yourself.

> And besides I see other issues that are *not* postponed and have a far
> higher priority level that are issues purely "hypothetical" that have
> almost no chances to appear in "real-world" scores.

If the different of priority levels are important to you, point
out the "hypothetical" problems and I'll lower their priority.

> We could have a kind of "polling system" to determine what are the
> features/issues that are really wanted by users.

That already exists; there's a "stars" function built-in to google
code.  It's not particularly useful, but go ahead and "star"
issues that you care about.

> And also a point about bounties/sponsors in relation (there are people
> on the french mailing list that wants to donate to the project but it
> currently lacks a structure to manage these donations).

Such a discussion would happen during GOP, after 2.14 is out.  I
have added it to list.

- Graham