[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.13.40 regtests

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: 2.13.40 regtests
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:47:43 -0000

"Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
On 21 November 2010 23:16, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:

Huh. So evidently there's some other reason behind the fix for
this break not being detected? It might be related to the
imagemagick's syntax change:

I don't think this is the problem.

The check relies on a grob existing in the baseline image for
comparison with the check image; in this case, there's no BassFigure
in the original image, and its appearance in the changed image has no
effect on other bounding boxes, so there's no distance change.


So if a completely new bit of graphics appears, the regtest checker wouldn't spot it? Not sure that's too good. What's the checker written in?

Phil Holmes
Bug Squad

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]