bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: horizontal spacing regression


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: horizontal spacing regression
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:49:37 -0000

"Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:22:53 -0800, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:

\override Accidental #'extra-spacing-height = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)

That works nicely, on both the original music example we looked at on -user, and my new favorite example:

\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\version "2.13.43"
{ \clef bass
%  \override Accidental #'extra-spacing-height = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)
  \repeat unfold 8 {f8 bes bes f }
}

The rising line of notes is usually spaced a little further apart, when possible, to compensate for the optical effect oval shape of the heads, as you and Janek have been discussing recently. The accidental seems to cause LilyPond (all versions) to revert to the spacing for a constant-pitch series. This makes some sense because the accidental destroys the oval-shape illusion, but it looks strange when the accidental is crowded and nearby notes are spaced with the optical correction in place.

The extra-spacing-height seems to do just the right thing. True, it gives no extra space when the interval is larger {c be be f } but neither did 2.12.3 and I think we don't need it there.

-Keith

Bug or no-bug?


--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]