Re: Bug in ties over barlines

[James Lowe]

hello

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Kobel <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:14:23 +0100
To: Jan Warchoł <address@hidden>
Cc: lilypond-user <address@hidden>, bug-lilypond
<address@hidden>, lilypond-devel <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug in ties over barlines

>By the way: if you have  { r2.. cis8( | c2!) r2 }  all over the place,
>and then there suddenly comes a  { r2 cis2~ | cis2 r2 }, you'd expect an
>additional sharp there too, don't you?

Hmm...why not use (in your example) { r2.. cis8( | c2?) r2 } which to me
makes more sense. After all, assuming you are in C-major here then why
would you NOT use a cautionary than a regular accidental. In this case you
would NOT need to put the additional sharp in your second example.

No one (as I can see) has spoken about the ? Vs ! And I think that's the
difference for me. It depends on what is already sharp/flat in the key
signature as a musician. ! Means it isn't and ? Means it is but 'be aware'
right?

James