Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:16:55AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> Too hard for people with less than 5 hours of training to
> determine.
I am not sure I understand that rationale.
git log origin
Is it there or not? Can you think of a _simpler_ test that works for
figuring out something is in _staging_?
Frankly, I don't think it would be horrible if nobody even _tried_
to verify patches and just automatically marked them as verified.
But if people want to do a bit more than that, I think that
checking for the commit in savannah is a decent trade-off.
I disagree. I consider it a total waste of time to just check if
Savannah has at one time heard about the commit id in whatever context.
The commit id is known to Savannah even if a push is rejected by the
server (since it receives the commit object before making the decision).
Either we connect the status with something that has anything remotely
to do with verification, or we don't. And if we don't, we should not go
waste anybody's time on it.