[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 694 in lilypond: Enhancement: easier use of microtone accident
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 694 in lilypond: Enhancement: easier use of microtone accidentals |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:50:53 +0000 |
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #13 on issue 694 by address@hidden: Enhancement: easier use of
microtone accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=694
Yes, this is 80% a documentation issue. The new snippets were originally
intended for these documentation sections:
NR 2.8.1 Microtonal Notation <http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=784>
NR 2.8.1 Contemporary Key Signatures and Harmony
<http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=786>
NR 2.10.1 Extending notation and tuning systems
<http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=785>
However, the re-definition of the note-name tables make the snippets too
long to include in the documentation. So, the other 20% is splitting out
the redefinitions into an include-able file (similar to 'makam.ly') or
maybe as new music functions.
If I can figure out how to do the 20% (which might involve too much scheme
and \context stuff for me) I'll make Reitveld issue implementing that part
and link it here, so that a Docs patch could be built on top of that.