[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 2308 in lilypond: Patch: Checks to see that stencil commands h
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 2308 in lilypond: Patch: Checks to see that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments. |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:34:08 +0000 |
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-needs_work
Comment #3 on issue 2308 by address@hidden: Patch: Checks to see
that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2308
DCan we resolve the question of whether this is ready or not, please? There
is discussion in rather . . . blunt . . . tones which suggests it needs
work. Mike/David/Han-Wen, please update status.
Off tracker and off Rietveld discussion quoted for context:
Mike wrote
"Han-Wen,
Is there a specific reason for using a permanent Scheme variable in the C++
instead of a lookup call to the lily module? If it's just happenstance
then I'll move these structures to Scheme and access them from the Scheme
module."
Han-Wen replied:
"My idea is was to abstract the concrete list away.
There is no strong reason for that though, so if you want to change
it, feel free."