[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retrograding with convert-ly
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: retrograding with convert-ly |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2012 08:19:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 05:52:09AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
>
> I just applied convert-ly to a file which contained \version "2.15.41" - now
> the version is "2.15.40"!
Thanks for the report, Eluze.
Did you run the version of convert-ly released with Lilypond 2.15.41?
> certainly not really harmful but maybe worth to be reported.
This sounds like a concrete bug to me. Is that also your opinion?
Please confirm whether you expect a bug report to be created in
response to this, or not.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
- retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/14
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly,
Colin Hall <=
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Colin Hall, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Graham Percival, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16