[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Spam??] Problem building doc section without built LilyPond

From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: [Spam??] Problem building doc section without built LilyPond
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:34:02 +0100

Urs Liska wrote Monday, April 15, 2013 5:07 PM

>> I have the impression that (with my previous patch about .itely and 
>> .itexi files) doc-section.sh should work with both, and it should be 
>> possible to completely remove cg-section.sh (and of course update the 
>> doc).
>> If you think that's true I could do that, make a patch and suggest it 
>> for inclusion.
>> Otherwise I'd just add the necessary comments to complement my current 
>> (not-yet-sent) patch.
>> Best
>> Urs
> OK, what the heck:
> Here is a patch trying to fix the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh, 
> along with a comment in the CG.
> If I have time I'll look into the other BUILD_DIRECTORY dependencies.
> And if you can confirm my impression I would also make a patch removing 
> cg-section.sh and the reference in the CG.

Urs, sorry for the late reply.  I've got a chest infection which means I'm
not feeling too bright at the moment.  When I improve I'll try out the
patch you attached.

The main use of doc-section.sh is for Windows users who cannot easily
build the docs, and at the moment I'm the only one doing that, I think,
and I have my own local variant anyway.  What I suggest is you make the
changes you suggest and test them out under Linux, then pass them to me
and I'll see if they work within the MinGW Bash shell under Windows
(well, under Vista as that's all I have).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]