[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything

From: Janek Warchoł
Subject: Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:22:35 +0200


2013/6/22 Pavel Roskin <address@hidden>:
> It looks like you created an alternative to partcombine!  That's very
> impressive!

It's almost like implementing the partcombine logic in LilyPond itself :)

> But I wonder what limitations your approach has compared to
> partcombine.

as far as i know, the drawbacks are:
- you have to insert the commands eveerywhere inside the music source,
- you have to use different definitions of these commands in score and
parts.  It's quite easy to do this using includes.

>> Feel free to use this snippet as you wish :)
> I mean, we need something in Documentation/snippets.

ah, ok.  Indeed, that'd be useful.

> I might try to convert one of the scores from partcombine to your approach.

You may want to take a look at
which was created by my fellow choir members - crowd-engraving at its
best :) 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]