Re: second+ voice cross-measure slur problem

[Urs Liska]

Am 29.07.2013 08:21, schrieb Papanastasiou Spyridon:
> > I'm not top posting.
> \version "2.16.2"
> \new Staff {
>    <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1(}>>
>    <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1)}>>
>    <<{\voiceOne a1(}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
>    <<{\voiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
> }
>
> the first slur is not connected
It is because you are using a polyphonic construct where the _first_ 
voice is considered a contigious voice while the second is instantiated 
only during that polyphonic section.
Maybe this post on lilypondblog.org can help you understand the issue?:
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/voice-contexts-in-temporary-polyphonic-sections/

HTH
Urs