[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Website Work
From: |
Federico Bruni |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Website Work |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:12:07 +0100 |
2013/12/6 Phil Burfitt <address@hidden>
> Carl, you might also like to keep in mind Lilypond's search rankings while
> you redesign. A first page listing would bump up traffic considerable, and
> shouldn't be hard to achieve given that whoever designed lilypond's
> homepage hasn't given any thought to SE ranking - there's just no relevant
> text. (might rank well with "We are happy/pleased/proud to announce"
> though).
>
>
:-)
> google search term: "music notation software"
>
> 1. musescore.org
> 2. sibelius.com
> 3. finalemusic.com
> .
> 18. lilypond.org
>
>
> google search term: "free music notation software"
>
> 1. musescore.org
> 2. finalemusic.com
> 3. noteflight.com
> .
>
>> 200 lilypond.org (couldn't find it - I stopped at page 20)
>>
>
>
>
This is really bad, I never checked it.
These problems should be recorded in our tracker.
So far I've seen 2 issues/feature requests:
1. improve SEO
2. associate a different color scheme to each manual
This is the list of issues when searching "website" in our tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=website&colspec=ID+Type+Status+Stars+Owner+Patch+Needs+Summary&x=type&cells=tiles
A label:Website may be useful?
- Re: Lilypond Website Work,
Federico Bruni <=