|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: \parenthesize collision with dots |
Date: | Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:58:58 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 20.12.2013 21:25, schrieb James:
On 18/12/13 06:18, Urs Liska wrote:Am 18.12.2013 07:15, schrieb Mike Solomon:On Dec 18, 2013, at 1:00 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:If I parentesize a dotted note with { \parenthesize f'2. } the right paren collides with the dot. UrsDo you want the dot to shift to avoid the collision or the parenthesis to encompass the dot? Cheers, MSHm, from the example itself it would seem better to shift the dot, but I'm not sure about the tradeoffs when you have a more complex situation, i.e. with more than one dot, e.g. { < \parenthesize f'2. a'> } Urs _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypondWell there was http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=155 Is this applicable? If so we could change the subject to reflect dots and accidentals - I don't know if dots and accidentals are the same 'family' of attached objects or if it warrants a separate tracker. James
From a user's perspective I'd say it is _one_ issue that \parenthesize should take care of what to enclose. However, I don't know if these are two different things from the implementation POV (i.e. if the two problems can/should be solved together).
Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |