Re: NR 1.4.1: printing-a-repeat-sign-at-the-beginning-of-a-piece.lyis obsolete since 2.18?

[Federico Bruni]

I've added the issue:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3801

we'd better continue the discussion there

2014/1/11 Eluze <address@hidden>

> Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> > The removal of the snippet is worth an issue.
> >
> > The updating/removal of the snippet - which do people think is better?
>
> imo it's worth to mention that you can force the opening repeat bracket to
> show.
>
>
>
> another topic is the behavior of rehearsal marks with the first bar line to
> print:
>
> with an explicit \bar "..." the rehearsal mark is placed right above this
> bar - without it seems attached to the clef (which looks ugly)!
>
> repeatBarAtbeginningNew.ly
> <
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n157608/repeatBarAtbeginningNew.ly
> >
>
> <
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n157608/repeatBarAtbeginningNew.png
> >
>
> should we discuss if an empty bar should be inserted automatically?
>
> Eluze
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/NR-1-4-1-printing-a-repeat-sign-at-the-beginning-of-a-piece-ly-is-obsolete-since-2-18-tp157541p157608.html
> Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>