[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spacing.itely sectioning does not match menu
|
From: |
James |
|
Subject: |
Re: spacing.itely sectioning does not match menu |
|
Date: |
Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:03:26 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
On 06/08/14 20:34, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Building docs from scratch, I get an error in French (I'm on it) but also
>
> "Please check the logfile notation.bigtexi.log for errors
>
> make[3]: *** [out-www/notation-big-page.html] Error 255
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> Please check the logfile notation.splittexi.log for errors
> "
>
> and in notation.splittexi.log:
>
> "
> ** Node following `Optimal page breaking' in menu `Optimal page turning'
> and in sectionning `Minimal page breaking' differ
> ** No node following `One-line page breaking' in menu, but `Optimal page
> turning' follows in sectionning
> "
>
> Menu announces:
> * Manual page breaking::
> * Optimal page breaking::
> * Optimal page turning::
> * Minimal page breaking::
> * One-line page breaking::
>
> But sectioning is:
> 1488: @subsection Page breaking
> 1503: @unnumberedsubsubsec Manual page breaking
> 1587: @unnumberedsubsubsec Optimal page breaking
> 1603: @unnumberedsubsubsec Minimal page breaking
> 1626: @unnumberedsubsubsec One-line page breaking
> 1643: @unnumberedsubsubsec Optimal page turning
>
>
> Which one to believe saying the truth?
That's my fault
:(
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=aec840a735b33a4be38b10baeb40f8e660e3d55c
"
* Re-ordered some of the @nodes so that they are grouped more logically"
I forgot to change/check the 'menu' ordering
So the 'truth' is the sectioning.
I'll fix that in a patch now.
Interesting that this doesn't break a full doc for me.
James