[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New feature suggestion
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: New feature suggestion |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:56:19 -0500 |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:
> Knute Snortum <ksnortum <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Just my two cent's worth:
> >
> > Adding an "n" modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
> > assertion. "Yes, I really mean natural. No, I didn't just forget the
> > sharp."
>
> That sounds like a benefit, but I would think that people who value
> "cn" for that reason would prefer a language definition that did not
> include plain "c", so that Lilypond would not even produce output
> based on such an error.
>
>
The "cn" would be used presumably to reflect the fact that the output will
have a natural sign. Requiring that C in C major be notated as "cn"--if
I'm understanding you correctly--doesn't make sense.
--David
- Re: New feature suggestion, (continued)
- Re: New feature suggestion, David Winfrey, 2014/08/23
- Re: New feature suggestion, David Kastrup, 2014/08/23
- Re: New feature suggestion, David Nalesnik, 2014/08/23
- Re: New feature suggestion, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/08/23
- Re: New feature suggestion, Phil Holmes, 2014/08/23
- Message not available
- Re: New feature suggestion, Keith OHara, 2014/08/26
- Re: New feature suggestion, David Kastrup, 2014/08/26
- Re: New feature suggestion, David Nalesnik, 2014/08/26
- Re: New feature suggestion, Knute Snortum, 2014/08/26
- Re: New feature suggestion, Dan Eble, 2014/08/26
- Re: New feature suggestion,
David Nalesnik <=
- Re: New feature suggestion, Dan Eble, 2014/08/27
- Re: New feature suggestion, David Kastrup, 2014/08/27
- Re: New feature suggestion, Janek WarchoĊ, 2014/08/23
- Re: New feature suggestion, Graham King, 2014/08/26
Re: New feature suggestion, Keith OHara, 2014/08/25