|
From: | Thomas Schuch |
Subject: | Re[2]: \stopStaff and \break produce BarLine at the end of the upper line |
Date: | Tue, 19 May 2015 18:33:49 +0000 |
User-agent: | eM_Client/6.0.21372.0 |
Well, that seems like a very specific use case. And you may easily work around using\version "2.19.17" { \stopStaff s1 \once\omit Staff.BarLine \break \startStaff a \stopStaff }I agree that one might expect not to have a lonely bar line there, but it is printed regardless of the break. Can you give a convincing reason why this would be wrong?Yours, Simon Am 14.05.2015 um 20:42 schrieb musicus:\version "2.19.17" { \stopStaff s1 \break \startStaff a \stopStaff } _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Sure, the \break is not necessary to demonstrate the "lonely bar". Every time you use \startStaff again at the beginning of a system, the upper system has the bar at its end. The problem with \once \omit Staff.BarLine is, that you must know, where your breaks are and you have to use it every single time.
"Can you give a convincing reason why this would be wrong?"Why would you want to have a lonely BarLine without a Staff or musical content?
Yours, musicus
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |