bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PATCHES: Countdown for August 26th 2015 - IMPORTANT UPDATE TO PATCH


From: James
Subject: Re: PATCHES: Countdown for August 26th 2015 - IMPORTANT UPDATE TO PATCH REVIEW PROCESS - PLEASE READ
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:32:50 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0

Hello,

On 23/08/15 18:16, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2015-08-23 18:58 GMT+02:00 James Lowe <address@hidden>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> ***Important do please read***
>>
>> Google Tracker will be 'read-only' on the 25th August. At the moment,
>> as I understand it we are still 'transitioning' to a new tracker
>> system for issues but Rietveld is still working as normal.
>>
>> This will make keeping track of patches a bit more involved for me to
>> keep track of current/in progress changes as well as making sure that
>> I know which patches need (re)testing.
>>
>> There were some suggestions about sending git formatted patches to
>> 'bug' but as they are all going to probably end up at my feet (so to
>> speak) I am proposing the following.
>>
>> After today (August 24th onwards) can we do the following please:
>>
>>
>> 1. For NEW patches (as well as those patches that have had updates,
>> and so need RETESTING) I'd prefer if they were uploaded to Rietveld as
>> normal first and then the *URL* to Rietveld issue emailed to me
>> instead of the git formatted patch. This makes sure that if a patch is
>> 'lost' or 'missed' or 'forgotten' then we still have the Rietveld
>> issue to fall back on and at the same time we don't clog the dev list
>> up with patch files of different dates versions.
>>
>> Put an appropriate string in the subject of the email sent to me like
>> 'PATCH TO TEST' or 'PATCH UPDATED' or something obvious like that and
>> I'll hopefully do the rest.
>>
>> Try to use address@hidden email address rather than my gmail account -
>> I'll monitor both but keeping things in one place is simpler for me.
> You mean a private mail, iiuc.
> [...]
Yes.

James



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]