[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allura at SF is ready
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Allura at SF is ready |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:32:59 +0100 |
Benkő Pál wrote Friday, August 28, 2015 8:01 PM
>> The migration of the tracker from GC to Allura at SF has gone well.
>> Attachments are present and searches work (in the Allura style, which takes
>> some getting used to, but is pretty comprehensive.) I've set up some common
>> searches to make things easier. You can view it here to inspect and play
>> with no need to register or log on:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
>
> I've taken a look and mostly like it.
Thanks! :)
> my only (not too big) problem
> is that writing "comment 38" created back-links in Google Code, but in
> Allura both the link and the comment number is missing. can it be
> configured somehow to at least number the comments?
The lack of comment numbers is due a a different design:
In GC the comments were strictly linear in time, so a
monotonically increasing comment serial number made sense.
In Allura, comments can be threaded (you can reply to an earlier
comment) and so a monotonically increasing serial number isn't
well-defined, but due to threading, back refs within an issue are
not needed so often.
There is a link field available in every comment to cut and
paste in order to refer to it from elsewhere, including other
issues, when threading doesn't meet the need.
Trevor
- Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/28
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James Lowe, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Colin Campbell, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/31