bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment


From: tisimst
Subject: Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:47:11 -0700 (MST)


On 9/22/2015 10:43 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> tisimst <[hidden email] 
> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181539&i=0>> writes:
>
> > On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> >> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email]
> >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181534&i=0>> writes:
> >>
> >> >>I'm not top posting
> >> >
> >> > Hi Squad,
> >> >
> >> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
> >> >
> >> > %%%%%%%%%%
> >> > \version "2.19.27"
> >> >
> >> > \transpose c c' {
> >> >   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
> >> >   R1*8
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > \transpose c c' {
> >> >   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
> >> >   R1*8
> >> > }
> >> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> >>
> >> Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
> >> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures 
> without
> >> the grace notes in them.
> >>
> >> Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
> >> talking about?
> >
> > I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the
> > same score):
> >
> >
> >
> > The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it
> > should.
> >
> > - Abraham
> >
> >
> > fbbigajb.png (87K)
> > 
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png>
>
> Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system.  So where's the difference?
> 64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)?  Different fonts
> (less likely)?

Sounds like it might be OS-specific. I'm on Windows 7, 64-bit, LilyPond 
2.19.27, using default fonts.

- Abraham




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p181540.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]