[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unnecessary bad beam warning

From: Palmer Ralph
Subject: Re: Unnecessary bad beam warning
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:57:39 -0500

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>

> Hello,
> maybe Lily should not give a ‘no viable initial configuration found: may
> not find good beam slope’ warning if the user has already taken care of the
> problem through the Beam’s positions property:
> \version "2.19.32"
> {
>   \stemUp g'8-\offset positions #'(-1 . .3) [ \stemDown e'']
> }
> (Yes, the example doesn’t make much sense.)
> Wishful thinking?

Perhaps, but you won't get it if you don't ask. I (Ralph) do not know how
to discriminate between problems with easy vs. difficult solutions, so I'm
adding this as Issue #4692 :

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]