Re: patch labels in CG manual

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Having had quite a bit of refactoring done in a number of issues this
> weekend, I am pretty sure that James would appreciate a return of the
> automated testing procedures, so that he can just go through visual
> checks of a whole batch when he has time.
>
> I feel kind of bad for the amount of involved issues but they are
> basically all independently testable and I would want to avoid
> queueing them as one bunch when they might have individual problems
> that are masked when combined.

I think I'll just smudge together everything from the
listener/acknowledger set (whether on review or new) that is not
supposed to cause an actual change and flush that out, crossing fingers.
Then rebase the rest in case it is affected.  That should only leave the
stuff that really warrants a separate test.

-- 
David Kastrup