Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

[Phil Holmes]

They are the only make doc logs on my GUB machine from the dates when I 
built 19.81 and 19.82, so they must be.

--
Phil Holmes


"David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:

> > > Would you show us the GUB's whole lilypond-doc log file?
> > > If you preserve the 2.19.81 (Jan. 2018) lilypond-doc log file,
> > > I'd like to compare the 2.19.82 log file (broken PDFs)
> > > and the 2.19.81 log file (correct PDFs).
> >
> > Zipped versions of both log files are attached. Hope this helps.
>
> To me both logs prove that building of e.g. the english notation.pdf
> succeeded and that the survival of the original pdf generated by xetex
> is impossible. Unfortunately reality proves something different.

Can it be verified whether or not the logs stem from a run actually
producing the respective valid and/or invalid PDF files or not?

--
David Kastrup