bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 197, Issue 11


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 197, Issue 11
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:40:11 +0200

Am Do., 25. Apr. 2019 um 22:35 Uhr schrieb Christopher Heckman
<address@hidden>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:05 AM <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 23:24 Uhr schrieb Christopher Heckman
> > <address@hidden>:
> > >
> > > I searched for this at the archives, but maybe I didn't look in the right 
> > > place.
> > >
> > > The title is pretty self-expanatory. If the pitch e is normally played
> > > on the 5th string of a guitar (after transposition), then
> > >
> > > \new TabStaff { <e\6> q }
> > >
> > > will show e played on the 6th string and then on the 5th string, even
> > > if you put a tie after <e\6>.
> > >
> > > (This is Lilypond version 2.18.)
> > >
> > > --- Christopher Carl Heckman
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for your report, though, see
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-fretted-strings#index-_005cchordRepeats-1
> > for
> > \tabChordRepeats
> >
> > Thus no bug.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Harm
>
> Fair enough. But shouldn't keeping the fingering information be the
> default? Especially if the chord is an immediate repeat?
>
> --- Christopher Carl Heckman

Well, in general `q┬┤ shouldn't, imho.
Probably one could think of making `\tabChordRepeats┬┤ the default for TabStaff.

Opinions?

Cheers,
  Harm

P.S.
Please always try to reply to the original mail not a digest, it
breaks threads in the archives.
Thanks.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]