bug-mailutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils]


From: Jeff Bailey
Subject: Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils]
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:29:00 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:23:35AM -0500, Sam Roberts wrote:

> I'd like to see tests, and would really like there to be a test
> framework. Having one makes it easier and faster to write code. The
> *unit test stuff (based on a 5 minute look at the cppunit docs :-))
> are fancy asserts. Maybe nice, but certainly not necessary.

I jhaven't looked at the cunit stuff.  junit and cppunit are nice
because they extend the object for adding a testing apparatice on to
them.  That way it's quite easy to test what's going into and coming
out of a specific object.

That make test-first programming a possibility.  I haven't gotten
there with my coding, but two of my friends have and I'm trying to
acquire the ability.

-- 
Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've
had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery
 - hendridm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]