[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils, and the licencing web
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils, and the licencing web |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:38:32 +0300 |
> So, my question:
>
> - can sieve, the library or the executables, be distributed with mailutils?
[...]
> - can mail.local be distributed with the sieve library, when part of that
> library is CMU licenced?
I believe so. CMU license is compatible with GPL, although it is maybe
a little vague.
> As for mu_arp_parse(), it's GPLed, so any code that calls it turns into
> GPL as well, correct? So, if somebody has an app that either can't, or
> they don't want, be GPLed, they cannot use it as a configuration mechanism,
> they have to use some other kind of config mechanism. Do I understand
> correctly?
Yes, that's correct. If you think it is a problem, I have no objections to
passing it under LGPL. However, it uses argcv.c, which in turn is
GPL-ed.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, (continued)
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Sam Roberts, 2002/04/12
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/04/12
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Alain Magloire, 2002/04/12
- mailutils, and the licencing web, Sam Roberts, 2002/04/12
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Alain Magloire, 2002/04/12
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/13
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Sam Roberts, 2002/04/13
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, xystrus, 2002/04/13
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/04/11