[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mon, 05 Aug 2002 18:35:11 +0300
> I got the following bug report:
The report is quite reasonable. Mailutils' mail is backward compatible
with both 'mail' and 'mailx'. So it won't do any harm to provide a link.
> Does anyone know of any relevant documentation that says what
> mail/mailx should be called?
Mailx appeared as an 'extended implementation' of mail. However I
haven't heard about any standards requiring that mailx be present.
- 'mailx', Jeff Bailey, 2002/08/05
- Re: 'mailx',
Sergey Poznyakoff <=