[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-mailutils] Re: Branching for 0.5 (was: i18n issue)
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
[bug-mailutils] Re: Branching for 0.5 (was: i18n issue) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:59:06 +0300 |
Alain Magloire <address@hidden> wrote:
> Planning to branch/tag also ?
No, since branching is almost always counter-productive. It is
nearly impossible to merge the two branches afterwards, without
hurting their functionality and without introducing new bugs.
Of course, as always I have tagged the sources after the release,
just in case :) But we'd better avoid branching.
> I need to break stuff .. 8-)
Go ahead :)
> The iterator_t object is unfortunately tied with the list_t implementation
> where it should not be IMHO. I need a pure abstract iterator_t that
> could be implement on other things the a list.
Yeah, I remember I have promised you to implement it this way. I'll try
to finish it before the weekend.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, (continued)
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/21
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Alain Magloire, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Wojciech Polak, 2004/06/21
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
[bug-mailutils] Branching for 0.5 (was: i18n issue), Alain Magloire, 2004/06/21
Message not available
Message not available